A recent article published in the APA’s magazine discussed wether physios had a place in prescribing or delivering a weight loss intervention for osteoarthritis (OA). The particular intervention looked at an education tool for physios teaching them about weight management. It claims to include information about a ‘low-calorie ketogenic’ diet and biosocial elements of obesity. The tool was developed by endocrinologists, obesity researchers, tertiary education specialists, practicing physiotherapists and dieticians with experience in weight loss interventions for OA. I argue that they are ignoring key components of the management of osteoarthritis, that this program is selective in the data they are collecting (or at least sharing), and are presuming that weight loss is a safe and effective tool for all people with OA.
One of the most profound absences was the ‘psych’ part of the biopsychosocial elements of osteoarthritis. Instead they are only focusing on the biosocial aspects. I find this an interesting choice as in the management of all other conditions we are reminded to consider ALL the ‘biopsychosocial’ components. In this program, who is looking at the psychological component? Or perhaps it is being entirely ignored, in which case we need to do better. the ‘psych’ component is within our scope and we deliver psychological interventions every time we deliver any form of pain education or motivational interviewing. Are we suggesting that the psychological component conveniently no longer matters? What is more, the inclusion of information on weight stigma is helpful and a step in a positive direction. However, you cannot peddle intentional weight loss without perpetuating weight stigma. It is just that simple.
Throughout the article we are given snippets of data that suggest a ‘positive’ result – patients that took part in the diet and exercise program lost more weight than those in the exercise component alone. But at this stage it is unclear what this actually means clinically for patients. There was no information regarding reduction of symptoms or improvement of quality of life. Given the study is so recent (unpublished) there has not been any follow up. Given what we know about weight loss, the reported loss of weight is unlikely to be sustained and may even have negative consequences.
The article also suggests that weight loss is safe and effective for people with osteoarthritis which is not always the case. Many clients may have a history of an eating disorder (or at the very least disordered eating) making weight management an inappropriate intervention. Not only this, but dieting is a huge risk factor for the development of an eating disorder and people of all ages without a prior history are still vulnerable. While this study suggests that educated physios feel comfortable delivering dietary advice, it is important to note that nutritional advice should come from a dietician who has trained specifically in this area; there is a reason that we work in multidisciplinary teams, we don’t see psychologists rehabilitating an ACL do we?
I’d also like to acknowledge that the Knee Clinical Care Standards (2017) that recommend weight loss are superseded by the more recent OARSI guidelines that state that weight loss is not required for the treatment of hip or knee OA.
In summary, there are studies that suggesting that Physios can be trained in the delivery of exercise. But the question I ask is: should we?

